Everyone has an opinion about this, but theirs have less hot dog references than mine, so they’re not as good.
Let’s say that a group of hot dog vendors got together and formed a club. They were all different ages, races and religions but they were unified nevertheless. To be in this club you not only have to be a hot dog vendor, but you also have to hate America, and subscribe to the idea that all hot dog vendors should hate America. So this very small club just happens to get motivated enough to do something about their hatred, they take over a bunch of planes and crash them into buildings killing thousands of innocent Americans.
Even if none of the other millions of hot dog slingers in the world were on board with the whole “I hate America” thing, like it or not, the crazy rogue terrorist hot doggers represent them.
Even if it were years later, wouldn’t it be insensitive to the families of the victims of the great anti-American hot dog massacre to build say, a hot dog museum anywhere near where it happened?
2 comments:
Short answer: No.
Slightly longer answer: I disagree with your premise, and feel that there are several holes in your analogy.
First of all, see title. Second, I was worried that I was over simplifying things, so I ran this rant past some people that were smarter than me, before I decided to run with it.
So I'm curious, what do you think I missed?
Post a Comment